It is important, as a first step, to make the diagnosis of Dementia and afterwards try to determine its cause. Some cases of Dementia can be linked to metabolic or infectious diseases and are potentially treatable. It is important to keep in mind that different types of Dementia can co-exist in the same patient (overlapped) – for example it is very common the association between Alzheimer’s Disease and Vascular Dementia.

Oftentimes, the diagnosis of Alzheimer-Dementia is then largely based on exclusion diagnosis, i.e., exams are made to investigate treatable causes and when no of them are found, there is a strong probability to be a case of Alzheimer’s disease..

The diagnosis of dementia is made through:

  •  A detailed anamnesis (symptoms, family history, mental or cognitive changes);
  • Neurological tests (vision and speech, senses and reflexes, writing and drawing, walking and motor skills),
  • Cognitive tests (memory, concentration, feeling for time and space) – Mini exam of Mental State, Clock drawing test, etc…
  • Psychiatric evaluation (depression, anxiety, confusion, hallucination)
  • Psychometric tests (ability to make decisions, use of language, attention, planning and organisation, problem solving strategies)
  • Laboratory examination – extensive blood test, should include dosage of vitamin B12, evaluation for anemia, thyroid hormones, HIV, metabolic evaluation.
  • Electroencephalogram– to exclude epilepsy. It can also show some changes commonly signs found in dementia
  • Structural brain magnetic– resonance imaging (MRI): provides information about the shape, position or volume of brain tissue. Can show structural changes as brain tumor or atrophy of specific areas (For example, frontotemporal dementia is often associated with reduced volume in the frontal and/or temporal lobes.
  • Functional brain imaging – reveals how well cells in various brain regions are working by showing how actively the cells use sugar or oxygen. Functional techniques include positron emission tomography (PET) and functional MRI (fMRI). The technique currently most commonly used in dementia is fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET, which measures the use of glucose by the brain. FDG-PET studies indicate, for example, that AD is often associated with reduced use of glucose in brain areas important for memory, learning and problem solving.
  • Molecular brain imaging-Radiotracers that bind to beta-amyloid in the brain have been developed for use with PET scans, so that for the first time the presence of AD pathology can be detected in the living brain. Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) was the first radiotracer capable of highlighting deposits of beta-amyloid. Other radiotracers that bind to different chemicals in the brain may be used to assist in the diagnosis of other types of dementia. For example, PET scans that detect receptors for dopamine may be used to show the reductions in this chemical in Lewy body disease.
  • Cerebrospinal fluid exam– Research suggests that AD causes changes in CSF levels of tau and beta-amyloid, two proteins that form abnormal brain deposits in this disease. In the early stages of AD, beta-amyloid levels in the CSF fall and levels of phosphorylated tau rise. This technique can detect early changes indicating AD is under way before any symptoms are noticeable and is less expensive than amyloid brain imaging.
  • Plasma biomarkers– Although CSF biomarkers can be an early (and ongoing) indicator of amyloid deposits progression, the procedure required to obtain such data (lumbar puncture) is an invasive procedure with some restrictions for routine clinical use. To overcome these challenges, a strong focus has been placed on the development of blood-based biomarkers that can reduce costs and detect the early signs of AD. Some recent studies have found evidences of markers that could be helpful in the diagnosis and prognosis of AD but are still under research and not yet used in clinical practice. A set of ten different lipids from peripheral blood (serotonin, phenylalanine, proline, lysine, phosphatidylcholine, taurine, and acylcarnitine) was validated and can predict the disease progression within two to three years, with over 90% accuracy once the plasma level decreases as the disease progresses. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a promising fluid biomarker of disease progression. Serum NfL rate of change peaked in patients converting from the pre-symptomatic to the symptomatic stage and was associated with cortical thinning. Although blood tests represent a great diagnostic perspective for the future, to date they are not used in clinical practice.
  • Genetic tests – in cases of familiar AD, mutation on the usual genes involved (APP, PSEN1, PSEN2) can be identified by genetic tests. These tests can confirm the diagnosis and also determine whether a member of the next generation carries the mutation. A blood test can also identify the individual APOE allele (see section about AD genetic), but results cannot predict who will develop Alzheimer’s disease or not.

If no other diseases of the brain, such as tumours, infections or metabolic diseases, are present and drug-induced dementia is excluded, then the diagnosis of “Alzheimer’s disease” comes into focus.The presence of plaques can substantiate the suspicion, but the connection between plaque formation and Alzheimer’s is compelling. 

The diagnosis of AD is always made in a probability basis. The more suggestive signs of the disease are present (and fewer signs of other etiologies), the more likely the diagnosis is.


Clock drawing test for Alzheimer's diagnosis
Clock drawing Test


Hane, F. T. et al. (2017) ‘Recent Progress in Alzheimer’s Disease Research, Part 3: Diagnosis and Treatment’, Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 57(3), pp. 645–665. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160907.

Weston, P. S. J. et al. (2017) ‘Serum neurofilament light in familial Alzheimer disease’, Neurology, 89(21), pp. 2167–2175. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004667.

Preische, O. et al. (2019) ‘Serum neurofilament dynamics predicts neurodegeneration and clinical progression in presymptomatic Alzheimer’s disease’, Nature Medicine, 25(2), pp. 277–283. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0304-3.


Support us now!